Advanced Search

Explore the open archaeological data from our digs at Sudeley Castle

Save/Saved[<<]

FeatureShort DescriptionContextOptions
SUD_601Earthen moundviewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
SUD_602Circular Ditch [6010]viewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
SUD_603Hardcore capviewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
SUD_604The earliest feature in the trench is an artificial layer construction (F601). It was composed of a light reddish-brown silty sand (ratch) visible in the section of a ditch (F602). This is likely to have been created by digging up the surrounding sub-soil (ratch) to create an artificial structure correlating with the construction of the mound structure observed in Trench 7 (F701) and is likely to be contemporaneous. On top of this layer was a hardcore cap (F603) constructed of a yellowish-brown sandy clay with medium sub-angular stones moderately sorted. This was then capped with a brown clay (F604) as an apparent waterproof layer. Together these layers formed an outer and inner bank. The banks were marked on the archae-topographical and magnetometry survey and must be a direct correlate (Fradley et al, 2014). viewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
SUD_701Light reddish-brown silty sand with occasional medium and mod sub-angular stones poorly sorted viewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
SUD_702Cut [7006] of drain that had a sharp break of slope at the top with steep sides and a slightly concave base measuring .80m wide and 3.00m long within the trench. It was filled by reddish-brown silty clay with frequent small and medium stones some sculptured (7007).viewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
SUD_703Wall measuring 0.72m (N) - .79m (S) long and 3.00m wide on a north to south alignment. It was composed of frequent large and medium very angular stones (7011) filled with a light yellowish-brown sandy clay (7009).viewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
SUD_704Cut of east to west robber trench [7014] which was linear in plan with a very gradual break of slope at the top with gently sloping sides and a concave base measuring 6.30m long to the limits of excavation and 3.00m wide. It was filled with very fine sieved mid grey silty sand (7003).viewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
SUD_705Emma Dent’s 1877 excavation running north to south viewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
SUD_706Hardcore capviewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
SUD_707Clay capviewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
SUD_708Probable floorviewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
SUD_709Rubble layersviewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
SUD_710Robbed out wallviewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
SUD_711Garden bankviewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
SUD_801N-S aligned potential Tudor garden boundary wall. Same wall as F703viewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
SUD_802Tree bowlviewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
SUD_803Emma Dents trenchviewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
SUD_1001Victorian cast iron pipe viewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
SUD_1201Rubble dump (12002) on top of the mound (F1202) - possibly stabilising action or possibly just a dump of stone.viewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
SUD_1202The mound itself (F1202) - investigated with an L-shaped intervention that showed that it was built from a deposit of moderately compact clayey silt with frequent limestone pieces throughout, (12007), placed on top of the natural geology.viewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
SUD_1203Cut [12005] and fill (12003) of tree boleviewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
SUD_1204Cut [12006] and fill (12004) of tree boleviewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
SUD_1205Possibly the remains of a garden path with some slippage of stones/ debris from an ephemeral structure on top of the mound overlying it (stone roof tiles and nails were found in the deposit) or alternatively an intentional stone dump at the bottom of the mound to support it and/or aid in drainage. viewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
SUD_1301NE-SW, deep cut ditch/water channel with a later Victorian drainage ditch cut through it also aligned NE-SW.viewfailed to get markup 'enter'edit
Total Pages:  2Total Results: 26
Log Out